Why do some videos from the USA cause dumbness or loathing

In one of these videos, a cute white guy and girl voluntarily, with smiles, kneel down in front of a group of African-Americans and kiss their shoes. On the other, a whole crowd of white Americans is kneeling in front of blacks.

I am more than sure that none of those who are on their knees has ever had anything to do with any kind of slavery. And those in front of them, too, are not like any slaves. Among the protesters (or is it better to call them pogromists?) There are enough people with white skin. In another video, black men and women pull apart boxes of sneakers from an expensive store and bring them into expensive, obviously personal, cars. On which they leave.

All these fragments of American protests seem to hint at the fact that "everything is not so clear." One cannot blame everything on the “social protest” of poor African-Americans. Especially if they are owners of expensive cars. Just as it’s not worth everything to reduce to a war of “blacks” against “whites”.

US President Donald Trump has already announced that the Antifa movement is taking an active part in the riots and should be banned as a terrorist organization.

In our country, the word "anti-fascist" is historically used in relation to those who fought against Hitler. And therefore it sounds positive for most people. However, members of the anti-Hitler resistance and modern “antifa” have nothing in common with each other. “Antifa” are such anti-social aggressive radical informals, which often differ from skinheads only in the color of their laces. Subculturally, they are twin brothers. Even the demonstrations of "Antifa" ordinary citizens are often confused with the demonstration of neo-Nazis. Both there and there - the predominance of black, masks that cover his face, laced shoes. If skinheads are conditionally inspired by the “right” subculture, then “Antifa” is inspired by the conditionally left.

Antifa is not an organization. This is a subculture. It is difficult to ban a subculture. It’s even harder to ban ideology. Because the subculture is only its visible part. You could say that Donald Trump only tried to grab the dragon by the tail. Will he be able to pull out and defeat the dragon, or will the dragon devour Trump - will show soon.

This dragon is the worldview prevailing in today's West. The reader has already heard about the notorious “Western political correctness”. By the way, in the previous sentence I already violated this political correctness. According to politically correct norms, I should have written: "readers and readers have heard enough."

This political correctness will always put in front of a man - a woman, in front of both of them - a lesbian and a homosexual, and even earlier - a transgender. And, of course, representatives of any “oppressed peoples” will receive priority.

These are not isolated cases. This is such a worldview. It did not take on its own, but was very technically imposed on the West.

In the twentieth century, representatives of the Marxist movements quickly saw that the revolution that destroyed Russia did not go any further. Attempts to export the revolution to Germany and Hungary, even if there were hundreds of thousands of German and Hungarian "internationalists" who took part in the revolution and civil war in Russia, ended in failure. Moreover, the fascist regimes that came in the wake of the reaction to revolutionary activity began to threaten the revolutionaries themselves.

The revolutionaries saw that the world revolution had failed. But the working class, which was to become the vanguard of the revolution in the West, does not get poorer, but rather gets richer. Then they changed the idea of ​​a social revolution to a cultural revolution. They sought to destroy the existing, mainly Christian, culture and morality. And the goal was to create a world government.

A member of the Comintern, Antonio Gramsci, believed that while workers still had Christianity in their hearts, they would not respond to revolutionary calls. Together with Hungarian Cominternist Georg Lukacs, who was involved in cultural terrorism in Bela Kun’s revolutionary government, he introduced “sex education” programs in schools, promoted the destruction of family and religion, and they founded the Institute for Social Research in Germany, known as the Frankfurt School. And after the Nazis came to power, they emigrated to the United States.

They and their followers created the so-called "theory of criticism." This theory was a criticism of all elements of culture - Christianity, family, power, tradition, gender, morality.

Recall the work of Friedrich Engels, “The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State.” In the USSR, everyone studied it. It is difficult not to see in Engels' work hatred of the very idea of ​​the family.

Marx and Engels preached that matriarchy was allegedly destroyed by the patriarchy, and that women and children were the first property of men. Today, this opinion is not questioned in the Western university environment. On the contrary, woe to those who dare to doubt